≈ Reconstructed person · research hypothesis
Lucas Arentsz
Always inspect the supporting records.
Why are these mentions grouped?
The indexed name is exact and distinctive.
Method code: exact-name+adaptive-chronology-v2
Supporting registrations
- 1695-10-18 · Doopregister · doopvader
- 1694-04-10 · Ondertrouwregister · ondertrouwbruidegom
- 1686-07-13 · Ondertrouwregister · ondertrouwbruidegom
- 1686-07-10 · Doopregister · doopvader
- 1695-10-18 · Doopregister · doopvader
- 1694-09-14 · Doopregister · doopvader
- 1690-11-30 · Doopregister · doopvader
- 1690-02-22 · Doopregister · doopvader
- 1692-03-25 · Doopregister · doopvader
Possible VOC connections
Research leads, not confirmed identities. The score is not a probability.
1 medium and exploratory leads
- exploratory · 58/100 Lucas Arents · 1687